Navigating the Great AI Debate in High School Classrooms

 



The debate around AI use in the classroom is becoming impossible to ignore. As a high school teacher, I find myself going back and forth about when and how to introduce AI to my students. For my Grade 8 and 9 learners, I remain firm about limiting AI use. These years are foundational, and research shows that  dependence on digital tools can create gaps in core skills when students are still developing academic habits. My goal is to help them build confidence as thinkers before experimenting with tools that may do too much of the work for them.

Still, I know AI isn’t going anywhere. In our senior grades, teachers are encountering AI in writing, research, and creative tasks. Yet, there is an argument that AI can strengthen learning through scaffolding and differentiated assignments. This tension, caution with younger learners and guided exploration with older ones, shows exactly where my practice is experiencing innovation. 

The AI Assessment Scale in the image above has helped shift my mindset. Innovation, as I’ve learned in PME 811, isn’t only about adding new technology to my practice. It’s about reframing our thinking and shifting our perspective. This scale offers clear, practical guidelines for understanding different levels of AI involvement in student work. Having this structure reassures me that AI does not have to replace learning but can supplement it, especially for students who need additional support.

For me, this tool represents a small but meaningful innovation in my teaching. This gives me a clear framework that I can show students where I am OK with AI in the classroom. It also provides scaffolds of teaching how to use AI in the classroom. I would love to hear your feedback about this scale. Is this useless? Do we just completely ignore AI in classrooms at all times? Or, do we embrace the inevitable that AI will become a part of our lives and we should teach students ho to use it responsibly? Even though I have discovered this scale, I still debate the pros and cons to both sides of the argument, I am still deciding where I stand in this debate. Thank you in advance for your thoughts and maybe this scale helps you understand where you stand with AI use in the classroom.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introductory Post

 Hello fellow colleagues!  Like many of you, this is my first blog and my first blog post. I am looking forward to using this platform to document my learning journey from PME 811: Innovations in teaching and learning. I'm also eager to share any innovative tools, technologies, practices and perspectives that improve my craft this year. Thank you for visiting my blog and I am excited to learn about your learning journeys throughout the course. Jesse
Read more
 Module 3 - Part 2: Historical Foundations in Teaching and Learning The third article I chose was “There Are Nowadays Professors of Philosophy, but not Philosophers” by Pierre Hadot. The article highlights Thoreau’s believe “to be a philosopher is not merely to have subtle thoughts, but so to love wisdom as to live according to its dictates, a life of simplicity, independence, magnanimity and trust. It is to solve some of the problems of life, not only theoretically, but practically” (Hadot, 2005). The article continues to argue that people today live in a distracted way and are weighed down by unnecessary luxuries and worries, instead of focusing on what is truly essential for a good life. Interesting as the article was, innovation, creativity, teaching and learning were not explicitly referenced, however I made my own interpretations. Teaching in this context, could be about teaching students how to become philosophers in their own life, questioning, pondering, and investigating ...
Read more
 Module 3 - Part 2: Historical Foundations in Teaching and Learning 2 The fourth article I read was “Foreign Influences on Curriculum and Curriculum Policy Making in Canada” by George Tomkins. Tomkins examines how Canadian curriculum has been shaped over time by ideas originating outside the country. He emphasizes that tracking educational influence is difficult, but Canadian curriculum has never been developed in isolation. Instead, it has been shaped by French, British, and American educational traditions. Historically, early Canadian schooling was conservative and heavily influenced by church authority and British academic traditions (Tomkins, 1981). During this period, teachers acted as the authoritative source of knowledge. This began to shift in the mid 1800’s as industrialization, immigration, and social change emerged. Over time, foreign ideas also helped drive innovation, leading to the introduction of “New Education” initiatives such as manual training, science education,...
Read more